Uh-Oh! For once its MRS Clinton that's been caught with her pants down. Some joker named 'Hsu' (sounds like the 'shoe' that Larry Craig rubbed against the policeman he was trying to have sex with) turns out to be a shady criminal. Turns out that he just won a free one-way ticket to Beijing and accommodations right next door to Tommy Chung and Charley Tree. Mrs. C is 'shocked,shocked that shady cash has found its way into her coffers and is so choked with remorse that she is going to donate it to charity; my guess is the BJ Clinton Double-Wide Lie-Berry and Massage Parlor Foundation For Untracable Cash, or some other equally deserving entity.
Here's the comment I left on Townhall:
I love how these guys with a $45,000 annual income are able to make $35 million in political donations in three months. Reminds you of the vow-of-poverty Buddhist nuns and James Riady's gardener doesnt it? Fortunately for the Chicom's favorite female Democratic candidate the Republicans are too busy wringing their hands about Larry Craig bumping his shoe against a plainclothes policeman to worry about trivia like this. While these left-wing creeps are taking hundreds of thousands of dollars in shady donations they yell, "Culture Of Corruption" and the Republican Party just lays there like a stunned mullet, never seizing the initiative. And you cant blame this one on a biased media either, they broke the story, so now where is the group of Repub Senators on the Capitol steps yelling for an investigation and even empaneling an investigative committee? Which Senators are scheduling themselves on the Sunday blab shows to talk about Her Thighness's shady Chicom connections?
This story also points out that there is no serious opposition to Mrs. BJ Clinton in the Democratic party. Her so-called opponents for the nomination are nowhere to be found on this one, empty suits all. With opposition like this will any young female be safe within the Beltway after Jan 20, 2009? I doubt it.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
Oh, I Get It!
This Larry Craig (Soon-To-Be-Ex Senator From Idaho) thing, where he got busted trying to (yuck) have sex with a cop in an airport bathroom is just too much. I mean what's stinkier and more gross than an airport bathroom? Talk about weird compulsions. What drives a guy like that? Its unfortunate that the current political correctness prevents any serious look at homosexuality, just as the old Puritanism did. Anyway, the incident engendered a comment:
I used to think that Republicans opposed gay marriage because they were puppets of the Puritanical Christian Right. It turns out that the real reason is that they dont want to get stuck buying expensive wedding rings for their boyfriends. Hey Larry, you big dummy, why not just have a lobbyist pay for you to spend a couple of hours at Barney Frank's house and get it out of your system in a socially acceptable way? What is it with these guys? A stranger in a stinky airport bathroom; I hate to pass judgement in this age of no moral standards, but that shows the soul of a Furbish Lousewart-- certainly not the soul of a leader.
I used to think that Republicans opposed gay marriage because they were puppets of the Puritanical Christian Right. It turns out that the real reason is that they dont want to get stuck buying expensive wedding rings for their boyfriends. Hey Larry, you big dummy, why not just have a lobbyist pay for you to spend a couple of hours at Barney Frank's house and get it out of your system in a socially acceptable way? What is it with these guys? A stranger in a stinky airport bathroom; I hate to pass judgement in this age of no moral standards, but that shows the soul of a Furbish Lousewart-- certainly not the soul of a leader.
Who's the Schlemiel?
This was written as a comment on Townhall to respond to a Jonah Goldberg article attacking Alberto Gonzales as he resigns. I feel Gonzales is a result of a much larger problem-- the almost-total lack of leadership ability of one George W. Bush. Here is what I wrote:
My father once explained two Yiddish terms to me:
A schlemazl is the guy who knocks the can of paint off the window sill, the schlemeil is the hapless boob who gets splashed with the falling paint. Bush is the schlemazl. Gonzales is the hapless boob who was the victim of Bush's inability to confront his enemies. In the name of comity Bush has egged on the claque of left-wing creeps in the Senate who are devoted to his destruction. If Bush had directed the Justice Department to investigate Harry Reid's land deals,Chuck Schumer's credit checks, DiFi's hubby's defence contracts and a host of other scandals the situation would be quite different. If they're going to attack him for having a 'political' Justice Department than why not have one? Now he gets attacked for it while the Dems skate away free.
Conservatives always talk about media bias but if the media were given a hot, juicy investigation of a Democratic Senator they would report it. All we see are the Repubs cowering, waiting for the next media attack without realizing that you can seize the initiative and write the story for the media to report. Bush,the schlemazl, never got that. He never understood about intra-party discipline or how to confront his political opponents-- or even who his political opponents are (he's attacked his base more often than he's attacked the Dems). So now Sad Sack Gonzales, dripping with paint, goes to spend more time with his family. Another humiliating defeat for we conservatives who have been cursed with such a feckless leader.
My father once explained two Yiddish terms to me:
A schlemazl is the guy who knocks the can of paint off the window sill, the schlemeil is the hapless boob who gets splashed with the falling paint. Bush is the schlemazl. Gonzales is the hapless boob who was the victim of Bush's inability to confront his enemies. In the name of comity Bush has egged on the claque of left-wing creeps in the Senate who are devoted to his destruction. If Bush had directed the Justice Department to investigate Harry Reid's land deals,Chuck Schumer's credit checks, DiFi's hubby's defence contracts and a host of other scandals the situation would be quite different. If they're going to attack him for having a 'political' Justice Department than why not have one? Now he gets attacked for it while the Dems skate away free.
Conservatives always talk about media bias but if the media were given a hot, juicy investigation of a Democratic Senator they would report it. All we see are the Repubs cowering, waiting for the next media attack without realizing that you can seize the initiative and write the story for the media to report. Bush,the schlemazl, never got that. He never understood about intra-party discipline or how to confront his political opponents-- or even who his political opponents are (he's attacked his base more often than he's attacked the Dems). So now Sad Sack Gonzales, dripping with paint, goes to spend more time with his family. Another humiliating defeat for we conservatives who have been cursed with such a feckless leader.
Saturday, August 18, 2007
Clintonz, Clintonz, Clintonz!
Today John Hawkins wrote a column on TH 'Eight Reasons Why Conservatives Must Defeat Hillary'. My immediate quarrel was with the title-- Shouldn't it have been 'Eight Of The Many Reasons...etc'. Their incompetence is total, their corruptions legion, their ability to spout lies layered on lies is unmatched. If we have to listen to any more fables of the Goldwater Girl donating time to minister to the needs of illegal aliens in her wealthy Chicago suburb I think I'll hurl. If people are going to reelect these two pukes then they should stop complaining about corruption and dishonesty in government-- they are getting what they want.
Here is my posted response to the column:
That short paragraph on corruption failed to mention one of the most egregious examples of the Clint's corruption in office-- their relationship with the Chicoms.The Clints took millions from the Chicoms and millions from the Loral corporation. Shortly after this occurred embargoed missile-aiming technology was transferred to the Chinese. Read 'Year Of The Rat'.
Now Her Royal Thighness is flying around the country in a jet owned by Vin Gupta, a piece of human refuse who's business includes selling phone lists of 'vulnerable' senior citizens to telephone rip-off artists. The lovely and delightful Bill Jefferson (BJ) sits on the board of this company and has collected millions for his work.
The paragraph also didnt mention the Clinton Double-Wide Lie-Berry and Massage Parlor in Little Rock, a conduit for unreported 'donations' from criminals and foreign governments.
In a paragraph that apparently slipped John Hawkins mind (the ninth reason) is BJ's career birddoggin babes and bangin beaver. Belinda Stronach and the divorcee down the street at Chappaqua are just a couple that have made it into the press recently. Haven t we subjected ourselves to this national disgrace enough already? Doesn't Hilly's supervision of the 'Bimbo Eruptions' intimidation team disqualify her for any public office?
How about her 250+ 'I Dont Remember's' when she testified in front of the Grand Jury in Castel Grande (subpoenaed billing records found in her office after the statute of limitations had passed).
I could go on. There are a thousand reasons not to put these two creeps back in office. Lets hope the Oprah watchers and other mental defectives don't overwhelm us (with a few hundred thousand phony ballots added in in key districts) and hand power back to these two nefarious incompetants.
Here is my posted response to the column:
That short paragraph on corruption failed to mention one of the most egregious examples of the Clint's corruption in office-- their relationship with the Chicoms.The Clints took millions from the Chicoms and millions from the Loral corporation. Shortly after this occurred embargoed missile-aiming technology was transferred to the Chinese. Read 'Year Of The Rat'.
Now Her Royal Thighness is flying around the country in a jet owned by Vin Gupta, a piece of human refuse who's business includes selling phone lists of 'vulnerable' senior citizens to telephone rip-off artists. The lovely and delightful Bill Jefferson (BJ) sits on the board of this company and has collected millions for his work.
The paragraph also didnt mention the Clinton Double-Wide Lie-Berry and Massage Parlor in Little Rock, a conduit for unreported 'donations' from criminals and foreign governments.
In a paragraph that apparently slipped John Hawkins mind (the ninth reason) is BJ's career birddoggin babes and bangin beaver. Belinda Stronach and the divorcee down the street at Chappaqua are just a couple that have made it into the press recently. Haven t we subjected ourselves to this national disgrace enough already? Doesn't Hilly's supervision of the 'Bimbo Eruptions' intimidation team disqualify her for any public office?
How about her 250+ 'I Dont Remember's' when she testified in front of the Grand Jury in Castel Grande (subpoenaed billing records found in her office after the statute of limitations had passed).
I could go on. There are a thousand reasons not to put these two creeps back in office. Lets hope the Oprah watchers and other mental defectives don't overwhelm us (with a few hundred thousand phony ballots added in in key districts) and hand power back to these two nefarious incompetants.
Thursday, July 26, 2007
Just Another Gimmick
I clicked on R. Emmet Tyrell's article on Townhall about the idiots who contributed the questions on the 'YouTube Debate'. Mr. Tyrell focused on the morons who asked the questions. That's all well and good but the bigger issue, I think, is why do Democrats NEVER have to answer serious questions? They wag their jaws spewing whatever the polls at the moment tell them is popular with whatever demographic segment they happen to be speaking to and whatever they say, no matter how irrational, is unanalyzed and forgotten in time for the next bit of nonsense to emerge. Their true actions are never scrutinized honestly.
Here's my comment to Mr. Tyrell's article:
You Tube or any other MSM format becomes a vehicle for the Democratic candidates to avoid any serious questions. Mrs Clinton's relationship with a creep who sells lists of vulnerable senior citizens to con artists, no question there. The unbroken record of failure of government health-care systems, didnt hear that one. The Democrats opposition to a border fence, nope. The Dem's opposition to the John Doe law, didnt hear it. Any question about the use of an increasingly discredited man-made Global Warming theory to justify government control of the economy, nah- not there. They could have asked why Democrats run as conservatives and then go to Washington and vote like wacko leftists, but they didnt. Nuclear power, building refineries and drilling for oil? nope. Fortunately for the Dems, the Republicans, for some inexplicable reason, are also too befuddled to hit them with those same questions (and a whole lot more). The Repubs just stand on the cattle call stage and respectfully answer snidey questions about abortion.
The media is the problem. The idiots that are running it have no interest in serious debate. They are morons with an agenda pandering to morons with an agenda. Result-- Dennis Kucinich, Hillary Clinton and B. Hussien Obama are considered serious candidates.
Here's my comment to Mr. Tyrell's article:
You Tube or any other MSM format becomes a vehicle for the Democratic candidates to avoid any serious questions. Mrs Clinton's relationship with a creep who sells lists of vulnerable senior citizens to con artists, no question there. The unbroken record of failure of government health-care systems, didnt hear that one. The Democrats opposition to a border fence, nope. The Dem's opposition to the John Doe law, didnt hear it. Any question about the use of an increasingly discredited man-made Global Warming theory to justify government control of the economy, nah- not there. They could have asked why Democrats run as conservatives and then go to Washington and vote like wacko leftists, but they didnt. Nuclear power, building refineries and drilling for oil? nope. Fortunately for the Dems, the Republicans, for some inexplicable reason, are also too befuddled to hit them with those same questions (and a whole lot more). The Repubs just stand on the cattle call stage and respectfully answer snidey questions about abortion.
The media is the problem. The idiots that are running it have no interest in serious debate. They are morons with an agenda pandering to morons with an agenda. Result-- Dennis Kucinich, Hillary Clinton and B. Hussien Obama are considered serious candidates.
Wednesday, July 18, 2007
A Maverick By Another Name
Today on Townhall Debra Saunders wrote an exculpatory article about John McCain an his supposedly admirable 'maverick' status. She even mentioned his 'courageous' stands on global warming and immigration. Now, supporting legislation to turn the economy over to the Central Planning Socialists might be 'courageous' if you are convinced that global warming is caused by human activity (the CP Socialists are experts at decreasing economic activity), but if you think that global warming is a normal phase in the earth's climate cycle due to solar activity then this 'courageous' stand becomes a 'stupid' stand, engendered by a lot of New York Slimes and Washington Compost articles best left unread.
Anyway, here is my comment on Ms. Saunder's article:
Maverick aka LIBERAL. I guess you could admire Harry Reid for having the courage of his convictions if you ignore what those convictions actually are. Does that make him a maverick too? McLame has fought courageously for ACLU lawyers for terrorists, keeping conservative judges off the bench, against free speech and tax cuts,against drilling for oil in ANWAR and offshore --in fact he did more than anyone else, including his fellow maverick Harry Reid, to make the Republican majority in the Senate absolutely meaningless. Now this maverick wants Republicans to vote for him? He should get the mailing lists of his fellow mavericks Kennedy (McCain-Kennedy immigration) and Feingold (McCain- Feingold partial repeal of the First Amendment) and campaign for votes from people who agree with him.
Anyway, here is my comment on Ms. Saunder's article:
Maverick aka LIBERAL. I guess you could admire Harry Reid for having the courage of his convictions if you ignore what those convictions actually are. Does that make him a maverick too? McLame has fought courageously for ACLU lawyers for terrorists, keeping conservative judges off the bench, against free speech and tax cuts,against drilling for oil in ANWAR and offshore --in fact he did more than anyone else, including his fellow maverick Harry Reid, to make the Republican majority in the Senate absolutely meaningless. Now this maverick wants Republicans to vote for him? He should get the mailing lists of his fellow mavericks Kennedy (McCain-Kennedy immigration) and Feingold (McCain- Feingold partial repeal of the First Amendment) and campaign for votes from people who agree with him.
Sunday, July 1, 2007
Trent Lott For President
"Now, people are at least as smart as goats"
Why would a man of such sagacity fear talk radio?
Why would a man of such sagacity fear talk radio?
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Fairness Fun
Just tried to open a new blog on Townhall. First post (or attempted post, TH is real buggy)
Fairness.
Lets have Fairness in political media. And by political I mean shows like Oprah and the Daily Show. Now it goes without saying that Oprah's obvious 'Balance Partner' would be Ann Coulter. What wonderful TV that would make! After all TV doesnt really convey information, it exudes feelings, so lets let the feelings run strong. I want to see Ann run out into the audience and hug her little heart out. Just because we dont want to redistribute wealth and nationalize health care doesnt mean we cant feel your pain as well as the next guy.
I work in an animation studio (well, a lot of animation studios. Film production is like a giant game of musical chairs, everybody hopping from job to job) and its becoming more and more clear that most of my left-wing collegues don't read even left-wing blogs or newspapers (who can blame them? Strip away the psychotic invective and conspiracy theories and you're left with vague, unsupportable old Socialist nostrums that have to disguise their true intent because they are so easily discredited). Their main source of political information is the wretched 'Daily Show'. Playing clips and smirking along. Innuendo at its dumbest and least funny. But hard to argue with. I mean we all KNOW that conservatives are a mean, spiteful bunch of inarticulate clowns..dont we? If you start from that premise its easy to laugh along and your facile 'understanding' will enable you to cast just as valid a vote as the most informed policy wonk.
So who's John Stewart's 'Balance Partner'? He'd have Newt foaming at the mouth pretty quick, anyway Newt's sense of humor (if it exists) doesnt play out on TV. Fred Barnes? NAH! Mark Levin...BINGO!
Just let 'American Idol' set the tone. We reinvent elections. All the candidates from each party get (at first) a quick, few seconds to make their point. At which point our three judge panel... say Al Franken, Morton Kondrake and Mark Levin add a comment. Then America votes, each week one or two are eliminated and the time of the remaining ones is increased. Until the final episode and the two left standing.
So when people start talking 'Fairness Doctrine' dont close your minds. The permanent beurocracy is going to do whatever the hell it wants, regardless of who gets elected or what the law says so lets have some fun.
Fairness.
Lets have Fairness in political media. And by political I mean shows like Oprah and the Daily Show. Now it goes without saying that Oprah's obvious 'Balance Partner' would be Ann Coulter. What wonderful TV that would make! After all TV doesnt really convey information, it exudes feelings, so lets let the feelings run strong. I want to see Ann run out into the audience and hug her little heart out. Just because we dont want to redistribute wealth and nationalize health care doesnt mean we cant feel your pain as well as the next guy.
I work in an animation studio (well, a lot of animation studios. Film production is like a giant game of musical chairs, everybody hopping from job to job) and its becoming more and more clear that most of my left-wing collegues don't read even left-wing blogs or newspapers (who can blame them? Strip away the psychotic invective and conspiracy theories and you're left with vague, unsupportable old Socialist nostrums that have to disguise their true intent because they are so easily discredited). Their main source of political information is the wretched 'Daily Show'. Playing clips and smirking along. Innuendo at its dumbest and least funny. But hard to argue with. I mean we all KNOW that conservatives are a mean, spiteful bunch of inarticulate clowns..dont we? If you start from that premise its easy to laugh along and your facile 'understanding' will enable you to cast just as valid a vote as the most informed policy wonk.
So who's John Stewart's 'Balance Partner'? He'd have Newt foaming at the mouth pretty quick, anyway Newt's sense of humor (if it exists) doesnt play out on TV. Fred Barnes? NAH! Mark Levin...BINGO!
Just let 'American Idol' set the tone. We reinvent elections. All the candidates from each party get (at first) a quick, few seconds to make their point. At which point our three judge panel... say Al Franken, Morton Kondrake and Mark Levin add a comment. Then America votes, each week one or two are eliminated and the time of the remaining ones is increased. Until the final episode and the two left standing.
So when people start talking 'Fairness Doctrine' dont close your minds. The permanent beurocracy is going to do whatever the hell it wants, regardless of who gets elected or what the law says so lets have some fun.
And Now For Something Completely Different!
I also post comments on books. God, I'm a self-important, wordy bastard. Thank God no one will ever read this crap.
|
American Dynasties
David Boaz, writing in The Guardian.uk (June 8)talks of American political dynasties. He asks if it will be Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton. No wonder this country is in decline! Here's the comment I posted:
These incompetent morons are not a dynasty. You can be assured that Republicans (of which I am one) have been cured of the urge to vote for the liberal, bureaucratic, visionless, spineless empty suits who comprise the 'Bush' side of your dynastic equation. If only the Democrats would become equally disillusioned with the corrupt, amazingly phony and dishonest, sloppy, inept and vicious Clintons. The only thing that we can truly count on is the continuous, luxuriant growth of a feeble and oppressive bureaucracy which will, at some point, take us from prosperity to poverty.
These incompetent morons are not a dynasty. You can be assured that Republicans (of which I am one) have been cured of the urge to vote for the liberal, bureaucratic, visionless, spineless empty suits who comprise the 'Bush' side of your dynastic equation. If only the Democrats would become equally disillusioned with the corrupt, amazingly phony and dishonest, sloppy, inept and vicious Clintons. The only thing that we can truly count on is the continuous, luxuriant growth of a feeble and oppressive bureaucracy which will, at some point, take us from prosperity to poverty.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
